1.
The effects of two vitamin D regimens on ulcerative colitis activity index, quality of life and oxidant/anti-oxidant status.
Karimi, S, Tabataba-Vakili, S, Yari, Z, Alborzi, F, Hedayati, M, Ebrahimi-Daryani, N, Hekmatdoost, A
Nutrition journal. 2019;18(1):16
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a type of Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which involves the immune system attacking healthy bowel tissue. Vitamin D has an effect on the immune response, possibly by reducing inflammation, promoting immune system tolerance and improving the health of the bowel lining. Several studies have found a link between vitamin D deficiency and IBD, but the optimum dosage for vitamin D supplementation is not yet known. The aim of this study was to look at the effects of two dosages of vitamin D supplementation on serum vitamin D, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), total oxidant status (TOS), quality of life, and disease activity index in patients with UC. In this double blind randomised clinical trial, 50 patients with mild to moderate UC received either 1,000 (‘low dose’) or 2,000 (‘high dose’) IU/day of vitamin D for 12 weeks. At the end of study, serum 25-OHD levels had significantly increased in the high dose group and the increase was significantly more (6.7 ± 3.8 ng/mL) than the low dose (0.2 ± 0.5 ng/mL) group. Serum TOS concentration decreased significantly (- 0.37 ± 0.26) only in the high dose group. There was no significant change in serum TAC between two groups during the study. The quality of life score significantly improved in the high dose group compared to the low dose group and disease activity index score reduce in both groups but was significant only in the high dose group. The authors concluded that 2,000 IU a day of vitamin D can increase serum 25-OHD concentration and quality of life, and reduce disease activity in UC patients with vitamin D deficiency. They recommend that all patients with UC should have their vitamin D status assessed because they may benefit from vitamin D therapy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimum dosage for vitamin D supplementation has not yet been elucidated in patients with Ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of two vitamin D regimens in UC patients with vitamin D deficiency. METHODS In this double blind randomized clinical trial, 50 patients with mild to moderate UC, who met inclusion criteria, received either 1000 or 2000 IU/day of vitamin D (as low dose or high dose group, respectively) for 12 weeks. Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25-OHD) level, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and Total Oxidant Status (TOS), the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire - 9 (IBDQ-9) score and the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index Questionnaire (SCCAI) score were assessed before and after intervention. RESULTS At the end of study, serum 25-OHD levels significantly increased in the high dose group (P < 0.001) and the increase was significantly more than low dose group (6.7 ± 3.8 ng/mL in the high dose group versus 0.2 ± 0.5 ng/mL in the low dose group) (P < 0.001). Serum TOS concentration decreased significantly (- 0.37 ± 0.26) only in the high dose group (P value = 0.023). There was no statistically significant change in serum TAC between two groups during the study. IBDQ-9 mean score significantly increased in high dose group compared to the low dose group (P value = 0.001) and SCCAI score in both groups reduced (- 2.58 ± 2.16 and - 0.9 ± 0.3 in high dose and low dose respectively), while this reduction was significant only in the high dose group (P value ≥0.001). CONCLUSION Our results indicate that 2000 IU daily dose of vitamin D can increase serum 25-OHD concentration, and quality of life, while it reduces disease activity in UC patients with vitamin D deficiency. We recommend assessment of the vitamin D status in all patients with UC because they may benefit from vitamin D therapy.
2.
Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.
Martineau, AR, Jolliffe, DA, Hooper, RL, Greenberg, L, Aloia, JF, Bergman, P, Dubnov-Raz, G, Esposito, S, Ganmaa, D, Ginde, AA, et al
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2017;356:i6583
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Acute respiratory tract infections are responsible for more than 2.5 million deaths worldwide. Previous studies report consistent associations between low vitamin D levels and an increased risk of acute respiratory tract infection. Vitamin D may protect against respiratory pathogens of viral and bacterial origin, due to antimicrobial and other mechanisms. This paper is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 randomised double-blind placebo controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of acute respiratory tract infection. The trials were conducted in 14 countries in 4 continents and included a total of 11,321 participants of both sexes, aged 0-95 years. The follow-up durations ranged from seven weeks to 1.5 years. All studies administered vitamin D3 orally, using either daily or weekly doses or bolus doses 1-3 months apart, or combined daily and bolus doses. Individual participant data were obtained from 96.6% of participants. The majority of studies that were included in the analyses were considered to be of a high quality, with a low risk of bias. The analyses showed that vitamin D supplementation reduced the risk of acute respiratory tract infections among all participants. The strongest positive effects were seen in those with baseline vitamin D levels less than 25 nmol/l, when compared to those with levels higher than 25 nmol/l, although benefits were also seen in the latter. Furthermore, daily or weekly vitamin D supplementation, without additional bolus doses were shown to protect against acute respiratory tract infections, while regimens with large bolus doses did not. The authors concluded that people who are very deficient in vitamin D are most likely to benefit from daily or weekly vitamin D supplementation, without additional bolus doses, in the prevention of acute respiratory tract infections. They call for the introduction of public health measures, such as food fortification, to improve vitamin D status, particularly in settings where vitamin D deficiency is common.
Abstract
Objectives To assess the overall effect of vitamin D supplementation on risk of acute respiratory tract infection, and to identify factors modifying this effect.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data (IPD) from randomised controlled trials.Data sources Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number registry from inception to December 2015.Eligibility criteria for study selection Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trials of supplementation with vitamin D3 or vitamin D2 of any duration were eligible for inclusion if they had been approved by a research ethics committee and if data on incidence of acute respiratory tract infection were collected prospectively and prespecified as an efficacy outcome.Results 25 eligible randomised controlled trials (total 11 321 participants, aged 0 to 95 years) were identified. IPD were obtained for 10 933 (96.6%) participants. Vitamin D supplementation reduced the risk of acute respiratory tract infection among all participants (adjusted odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 0.96; P for heterogeneity <0.001). In subgroup analysis, protective effects were seen in those receiving daily or weekly vitamin D without additional bolus doses (adjusted odds ratio 0.81, 0.72 to 0.91) but not in those receiving one or more bolus doses (adjusted odds ratio 0.97, 0.86 to 1.10; P for interaction=0.05). Among those receiving daily or weekly vitamin D, protective effects were stronger in those with baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels <25 nmol/L (adjusted odds ratio 0.30, 0.17 to 0.53) than in those with baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels ≥25 nmol/L (adjusted odds ratio 0.75, 0.60 to 0.95; P for interaction=0.006). Vitamin D did not influence the proportion of participants experiencing at least one serious adverse event (adjusted odds ratio 0.98, 0.80 to 1.20, P=0.83). The body of evidence contributing to these analyses was assessed as being of high quality.Conclusions Vitamin D supplementation was safe and it protected against acute respiratory tract infection overall. Patients who were very vitamin D deficient and those not receiving bolus doses experienced the most benefit.Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42014013953.